<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kilo Bytes Per Second vs. Kilo Bits Per Second (KBps vs. kbps)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:11:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrgeestacks</title>
		<link>http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/comment-page-2/#comment-17462</link>
		<dc:creator>mrgeestacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/#comment-17462</guid>
		<description>This article is awesome!  I was on the phone with my ISP today (timewarner),  and i quote the rep as referring to the download speed of the service and called them BYTES(MBs), not BITS(Mbps).  SO what they are doing is FRAUDULENT.  She said i had 20 MBs down, when what she meant and what their commercials show is that i have 20Mbps.  So yeah, basically the rep doesnt know whats going on and some one slipped the capital letter game in there.  So they may just be lying to the subscriber or they just have no idea that they are promoting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is awesome!  I was on the phone with my ISP today (timewarner),  and i quote the rep as referring to the download speed of the service and called them BYTES(MBs), not BITS(Mbps).  SO what they are doing is FRAUDULENT.  She said i had 20 MBs down, when what she meant and what their commercials show is that i have 20Mbps.  So yeah, basically the rep doesnt know whats going on and some one slipped the capital letter game in there.  So they may just be lying to the subscriber or they just have no idea that they are promoting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spike</title>
		<link>http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/comment-page-2/#comment-17455</link>
		<dc:creator>spike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/#comment-17455</guid>
		<description>thank you - helped me out a lot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you &#8211; helped me out a lot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/comment-page-2/#comment-15602</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/#comment-15602</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article. Cleared any confusion I had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article. Cleared any confusion I had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikram</title>
		<link>http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/comment-page-2/#comment-14985</link>
		<dc:creator>vikram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/#comment-14985</guid>
		<description>many thanks for trhe info it is simple and sufficient

not good at these things so like most people i thought that i am not getting full speeds 

got the correct info now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>many thanks for trhe info it is simple and sufficient</p>
<p>not good at these things so like most people i thought that i am not getting full speeds </p>
<p>got the correct info now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lenroy</title>
		<link>http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/comment-page-2/#comment-14245</link>
		<dc:creator>lenroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/#comment-14245</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m still a little confused.my download speed shows 
kBps.is is it the same as KBps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m still a little confused.my download speed shows<br />
kBps.is is it the same as KBps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lenroy</title>
		<link>http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/comment-page-2/#comment-14244</link>
		<dc:creator>lenroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/#comment-14244</guid>
		<description>is there any difference between kBps nad KBps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there any difference between kBps nad KBps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ishan</title>
		<link>http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/comment-page-2/#comment-12536</link>
		<dc:creator>ishan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 06:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/#comment-12536</guid>
		<description>i was searching for this explanation from long time ,thanks for explaining in such a easy way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was searching for this explanation from long time ,thanks for explaining in such a easy way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abhijeet</title>
		<link>http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/comment-page-2/#comment-12518</link>
		<dc:creator>abhijeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 07:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/#comment-12518</guid>
		<description>Thanks man..for the nice article..
Going on now with clear thoughts about kbps and KBPS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks man..for the nice article..<br />
Going on now with clear thoughts about kbps and KBPS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/comment-page-2/#comment-12471</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 19:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/#comment-12471</guid>
		<description>Article shows the easy way to convert Kbps to KBps is : KBps = Kbps*0.1220703125.

The easy way to convert KBps to Kbps would be : Kbps = KBps*8.192.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article shows the easy way to convert Kbps to KBps is : KBps = Kbps*0.1220703125.</p>
<p>The easy way to convert KBps to Kbps would be : Kbps = KBps*8.192.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/comment-page-2/#comment-12287</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/#comment-12287</guid>
		<description>I think google multiplies by 1000, then divides by 8, and then divides by 1000 (instead of 1024).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think google multiplies by 1000, then divides by 8, and then divides by 1000 (instead of 1024).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

